Demand for electricity is accelerating at a pace the industry hasn’t experienced in decades. Much of this surge is being fueled by the rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI), alongside the longer-term trend of electrifying everything from transportation to heavy industry. Data centers, electric vehicles, and digital infrastructure are all competing for power and competing urgently.

Utilities had a standout year in 2025. But, as demand climbs even higher, they will need to scale capacity just as quickly. The immediate rewards are clear: sustained growth and rising revenues. Yet, the larger story is the critical role utilities will play in enabling national competitiveness in AI and advancing the broader energy transition.

The road ahead is as promising as it is uncertain. The opportunities are significant – but so are the constraints.

The Capgemini Research Institute’s Engineering and R&D Pulse Report 2026 (hereafter ‘Engineering Pulse’) highlights several structural barriers that could limit the industry’s ability to expand capacity rapidly and cost effectively. These include the high cost of asset upgrades, compounded by ongoing global supply chain volatility, as well as a persistent shortage of engineering talent needed to deliver them.

Energy leaders recognize the challenges. The question now is: are they ready to meet them?

The challenges ahead

Cost pressures have become one of the defining constraints on grid upgrades and expansion. 62% of energy leaders say that costs have risen significantly in recent years, and more than 80% say they must achieve 10–15% cost improvements in the next two to three years, simply to remain competitive.

This view is backed by the IEA, which recently notedPrices and procurement times for essential components like power transformers and cables have almost doubled in four years, creating significant hurdles for grid developers.”

Compounding this challenge are external pressures: roughly two thirds of respondents cite tariffs, trade barriers, and supply chain disruptions as major factors impacting their engineering and R&D operations, driving up both costs and project timelines.

At the same time, utilities are confronting a widening talent gap. More than half identify a shortage of skilled engineering talent as a key barrier to lowering costs and accelerating time to market. An aging workforce, intense competition for digital skills, and restricted access to global talent pools are all constraining execution just as investment needs surge.

And if utilities cannot deliver affordable, reliable energy on scale, others may step in. 62% of leaders see nontraditional entrants as a major threat. Data center operators, for example, are already investing in microgrids and signing contracts with providers of off grid power solutions – from solar to emerging fusion technologies. These developments represent both risks and opportunities, with utilities playing a key role in such endeavors, if they have the infrastructure to integrate them.

Utilities are rethinking how they deliver engineering

To meet rising and rapidly evolving demand, while keeping cost and risk under control, utilities cannot rely on traditional ways of working. Engineering and R&D models must be reimagined for scale, speed, and efficiency.

Encouragingly, most utilities are taking meaningful steps. A strong majority (84%) are investing in digital modernization, and many plan to increase that investment in the near term. However, only 20% have begun reorganizing and streamlining engineering operations, even though 70% say such changes are on their roadmap. These digital and organizational shifts will be essential to unlocking the productivity gains required to expand capacity cost effectively.

AI adoption, meanwhile, remains cautious: just 24% of utilities are deploying AI today, far below most industries in our survey. Still, three quarters expect to increase AI investment in the coming years. In a high stakes environment, a measured approach is understandable, but the potential for AI to enhance efficiency and accuracy means the industry will need to act soon.

Perhaps the clearest indicator that a new model is taking shape is the rising interest in global delivery. Historically, utilities have been regional employers, hesitant to offshore critical engineering work. But this model is no longer meeting talent or cost needs.

Today, 73% of respondents say they are using offshore Global Capability Centers to access scarce skills and improve cost predictability. Interestingly, this mirrors the evolution the oil and gas sector went through over a decade ago, as it faced similar pressures to transform.

A model built for stability is now under strain

For decades, utilities have benefited from long investment cycles, predictable planning horizons, and an operating culture centered on safety, reliability, and regulatory compliance. These foundations have served the industry well, ensuring secure and dependable service for millions.

The Engineering Pulse findings reflect this legacy. Safety and compliance remain the dominant priorities, cited by 77% of respondents. Agility, by contrast, ranks much lower at 56%, significantly below sectors such as automotive, where rapid iteration and responsiveness are embedded into the operating model.

Strategic priorities over the next 12–18 months% saying important
Cost savings62%
Time to market acceleration67%
Innovation and value creation using digital technologies63%
Operational efficiency41%
Scalability of engineering capacity45%
Agility and resilience56%
Sustainability51%
Safety and regulatory compliance77%

Utilities are now being pushed by external forces to move far faster than their traditional rhythms allow. AI data centers cannot wait years for grid upgrades. Digital technologies that could reduce time and cost cannot be fully deployed under today’s cautious, incremental approach. And utilities cannot hope to hire the tens of thousands of engineers required for this buildout while relying on geographically constrained delivery models.

Survey respondents acknowledge this reality. Many point to a weak innovation culture as a material barrier to progress. The industry has long optimized for perfection over speed, an understandable stance in a mission critical sector where safety and reliability are paramount. But that ‘slow and steady’ mindset now limits innovation, constraining cost reductions, and delaying urgently needed infrastructure upgrades at precisely the moment the system requires accelerated action.

Barriers to reducing costs, accelerating time to market, and scaling effectively% saying major challenge
Insufficient budget or investment62%
Lack of skilled talent66%
Legacy systems or outdated technology56%
Organizational resistance to change58%
Supply chain constraints68%
Regulatory or compliance challenges56%
Weak innovation culture60%

The crossroads moment

The message from Engineering Pulse is not that utilities should abandon caution, but rather that the current operating model alone is no longer sufficient for the market they are entering.

The only sustainable path forward is to rethink how engineering gets done, embracing new delivery models, modern digital tools, and a culture that balances safety with speed, efficiency, and access to global talent.

Utilities that make this shift will be best positioned to convert today’s Energy Supercycle into long term strategic advantage. Those who don’t may find that energy leadership – across AI, electrification, and the broader transition – moves elsewhere.