Pros and cons of differing distribution models

Publish date:

To meet the digital consumer from a marketing and lead generation perspective, the strengths and weaknesses would lie in the agent or agency’s ability to prospect digitally, the agent’s digital savviness, and ultimately the digital tools the agent has access to—and therein lies the importance of a carrier providing its own tools for the agent to use.

To meet the digital consumer from a marketing and lead generation perspective, the strengths and weaknesses would lie in the agent or agency’s ability to prospect digitally, the agent’s digital savviness, and ultimately the digital tools the agent has access to—and therein lies the importance of a carrier providing its own tools for the agent to use. Here are the different distribution models and their respective strengths and weaknesses when it comes to supporting digital:

Figure 4:   SWAT of Distribution Models

Source: Capgemini Financial Services Analysis, 2020

Another model carriers are increasingly leveraging is the Pseudo-Direct Model (Direct-to-Consumer processes augmented by agent assignment with reduced commissions).  While the strengths, weaknesses and threats are largely the same as “Direct to Consumer with no agent” above, the commission is no longer zero; however, this is often offset by agents providing service resulting in a smaller call center and reduced call center costs; channel conflict may be reduced.

Related Posts

Financial Services

Account-led innovation growth

Ranjan Pradhan
Date icon December 2, 2020

Innovation cannot be elevated in a vacuum. It requires formulating right design principles to...

data

Data-driven versus intuitive leadership ‒ which offers a decision-making advantage?

Amit Choudhary
Date icon November 23, 2020

In this installment of my Leadership Yin-Yang blog series, I will discuss disparate...