Our greatest challenge is that, currently, uncompetitive prices, lack of availability and perceived complexity are still pushing too many consumers in the direction of high-carbon, unsustainable solutions. And with the impact and aftershocks of COVID-19 already squeezing both national and personal finances, this conundrum is, by the day, becoming more and more complex.
But in so many ways, this growing complexity is bringing the task into even sharper focus. Our range of options are narrowing, and the only logical way forward is becoming clear. We must move on and leave our traditional structures and ways of working behind.
The global energy system’s key participants must go much further, much faster, if they are to avoid isolated islands of activity that are not interoperable, resulting in stranded assets and wasted investment. They must be bold; they must take the initiative. In short, they must lead. If they don’t, who will?
There are already worrying signs that, in the absence of sufficient vision and leadership, small, localised and disconnected solutions are filling the space created by inertia and limited progress. And while many of these efforts are laudable and successful in themselves, illustrations of the transformative powers of today’s technology, in the context of Net Zero, there are very real concerns that they will result in fragmentation, dilution of effort and loss of focus, or that they simply won’t deliver at scale.
The traditional energy market institutions must come together and act in unison to create the vision, framework, alignment and momentum for fundamental and lasting change, as well as creating a philosophy and an environment in which innovation can thrive and be scaled and brought to market effortlessly and at pace.
To illustrate the scope and scale of the shift required, if Energy 1.0 was the original state monopoly, Energy 2.0 was about enabling competition, and Energy 3.0 was about the arrival of renewables, an incremental step change to Energy 4.0, will not be enough.
Instead of a step, we need a leap: Energy X.0, a reimagined, flexible and agile market, without barriers, a blueprint where far greater participation, real competition and rapid innovation is encouraged, and exciting new products and services are developed, launched and consumed at high speed, at affordable prices. In the past, too many great ideas have taken far too long to mature.
There must be a focus on strategy, as well as tactics, on smart energy management, not just smart meters, on big ideas as well as low hanging fruit.
The leap to Energy X.0 is one that that we can undoubtedly achieve because it’s been done before. In telecommunications, for example, the deregulation of landlines and introduction of mobile, within a national framework and with clear standards and procedures, understood by all, resulted in ground-breaking industrywide innovation and transformation. Flexibility, agility and efficiency, within recognisable controls, helped to create a dynamic, fluid, seamless and simple consumer experience, delivering huge benefits for individuals and businesses alike.
What do we mean by new thinking? Well, here’s just one example; Here in the UK, we are told that the transition to half hourly settlement will be completed by the end of 2025, while, by contrast, on 1 October 2021, the Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) implemented five-minute settlement windows for spot prices in the National Electricity Market (NEM)*.
In our next bulletin we will take these ideas further, with our own vision for how to achieve a new energy market.
Meanwhile, if you would like to share your point of view, or you’d like to find out more about our thinking, we’d love to talk to you, to see how we can collaborate for the greater good, for Net Zero in 2050.
Experts
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Georgina Maggs
Business Development Director, |
Carl Haigney
Vice President, |
Julian Keates
Senior Director, |
Get in touch
Thank you for the submission.
We are sorry, the form submission failed. Please try again.