BPO Thought Process

BPO Thought Process

Opinions expressed on this blog reflect the writer’s views and not the position of the Capgemini Group

Tempted to rewrite Bill Gates’ rules on automation?

Category : BPO
For all those who need a refresh, here are Bill Gates’ two rules:
  1. “The first rule of any technology used in a business is that automation applied to an efficient operation will magnify the efficiency.
  2. The second is that automation applied to an inefficient operation will magnify the inefficiency.”

This is an old quote but it still makes a lot of sense. However, the rise of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) within Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) might tempt some to cut corners.

I don’t think anyone can argue with the first rule. It’s the second rule that some people are challenging. They may see automation as a quick fix to the problem of inefficient processes – a sticking plaster alternative to a big, disruptive, transformational change project.

I also think that RPA is a good thing, but I want to flag why we should be more wary than ever of breaking Bill Gates' second rule.

To make sure that we are talking about the same things, I have started with some definitions.

What is Robotic Process Automation (RPA)?

RPA is the use of software ‘robots’ to automate manual steps in a process that may be repetitive and managed by rules.

Many of the tasks delivered by BPO service providers involve people keying, checking, validating, aggregating and rekeying data.  Therefore, RPA has multiple opportunities in our industry.  In essence, it can create a virtual workforce working with extreme efficiency and accuracy on the activities that they are employed to deliver.

How RPA can be used to reduce the impact of inefficient operations

Let’s take an example of a complicated network of interfaced software systems that a lot of companies rely on.

There are often significant inefficiencies in the processing level where you may have to rekey entries between one system and another. Alternatively, there may be a step where one employee needs to extract information and email it to another team for them to re-enter it into a different system or spreadsheet.

The ultimate solution is, of course, to upgrade the software systems and remove the inefficient steps. But interfering with the main ‘Big IT’ system can be expensive, time-consuming and risky.

Rather than embark on such a daunting project, RPA can be applied as a kind of ‘non-invasive surgery’, at a fraction of the upgrade cost. In effect, it can make these large software systems more accurate, more manageable and more cost effective.

The future of process efficiency is not sticking plaster automation

It’s true that RPA can act as a great quick fix to reduce cost and improve accuracy - we’re seeing a number of examples where the time and cost of deeper change is prohibitive within a given budget cycle or other short term constraints.

However, if you used RPA to shore up creaking business processes there is a risk that over the long term, you would still eventually come unstuck. This mindset has the potential to mask the inefficiencies that can make a powerful business case for change, effectively institutionalising poor practices and inhibiting the necessary change for good in an organisation.

Let’s take another example where you have a poorly designed or outmoded customer interaction process in your business. You know it takes longer and costs more money than it should, so you automate some parts of the process. This is a relatively easy win to take costs out, but you’re not really tackling the key outcomes from that business process i.e. better customer experience leading to improved loyalty, sales growth etc. I worry that in a situation like this, the siren song of automation could lead an organisation onto the wrong path.

We see RPA best put to use after simplifying and standardising the business processes to magnify the efficiency, whilst leading to improved effectiveness, control and business value.

So Bill Gates is still fundamentally right?

Perhaps unsurprisingly, yes. I believe that you rewrite these rules at your peril. There is no quick and easy way to fix an inefficient operation for the long term. RPA may not magnify the inefficiency, but it may hide fundamental problems until it is too late. Use it wisely!

About the author

Christopher Stancombe
Christopher Stancombe
1 Comment Leave a comment
Your are so right..Application of RPA should be evaluated from all different dimension......maturity of the process, standardization of the process, business-impact and many more. I have written a white-paper on RPA applicability in the FP&A sector. Please let me know if you would like to have a copy. Thanks.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.