facebook://

Having 250 million members, Facebook is huge. If it was a country it
would be the fourth country in the world measured on population size
(US is third with 300 million, India and China are the numbers 2 and 1
with more than one billion people). It is an immense number and it is
just a matter of time before Facebook will separate itself from the
traditional Web.  With 250 million active members, one out of approximately
every six people who can be online is a member of Facebook.

Why should Facebook want to leave the traditional web? Because they
can? Facebook has an immense userbase and this userbase contributes
immense numbers of data (which can be information and knowledge) to the
platform. Every day five billion minutes are spend on Facebook, every
week one billion pieces of content are added and shared. Most of this
content is not shared with the outside world, is not indexable by for
example Google and is thus only available within the great wall of
Facebook. So Facebook already left the Web by keeping most if its
content inside its network.

Facebook does not need other sites
on the Web, other sites need Facebook. Why would Facebook still hinder
its members with the rather old-fashioned WorldWideWeb (which is slow,
since you first have to resolve the URL into an IP address via DNS,
then do the HTTP request to the web server, than receive the HTML and
other files and than render the page) and why wouldn’t they introduce
their own implementation (facebook:// instead of http://) which could
do more than just the aforementioned process?

Facebook has the
size to introduce its own browser-like platform, its own
operating systems and perhaps even its own hardware line. Facebook
could disrupt the Web and create a new (proprietary?) standard on how
the new Web could be. They can, because one out of every six people
that is online, has a Facebook account. They can because they have got
such immense amount of data and people who are spending so much time on
it, people will miss it when it is gone.

Facebook can, however will they do it?

Rick Mans is a social media evangelist within Capgemini. You can follow and connect with him via Twitter or Delicious

tweetmeme_style = ‘compact’;

About the author

31.thumbnail facebook:// Rick is on a day to day basis working on social media (strategy) cases for several (Fortune 500) clients. He lives and loves social media, helping people and enterprises in using social media in a way that adds value for them. He also gives guest lectures at several universities to make students aware of the impact social media will have on their life in general and on enterprises in particular in the near and not so near future. Is he a geek? Well… yes. A geek with a social life though. Even one with a wife and a young son, who’s first English words were ‘Social media’.




This entry was posted in Data, Security and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to facebook://

  • Neil Procter says:

    I like it. Good point. My view is that Facebook is becoming the universal customer master. Why should companies bother replicating people’s details between each other, just hook up to a facebook ID (I dont know the technicalities of this, just speaking logically). It cant be far off that people will be viewing their bills in a facebook tab, surely.

  • Nigel Walsh says:

    Rick – an interesting perspective. I don’t (personally) see them launching their own browser but instead allowing measured access through that great wall!
    Things like Facebook Connect have to be the gem in box. This opens up a whole new wave of users and 3rd party sites to connect with that they already know. Once they are all connected, then of course we get Facebook payments – to kill of PayPal… could that be the next target?
    There is some good articles on this by Rob Diana here:
    http://regulargeek.com/2009/03/22/sorry-twitter-facebook-is-the-data-gold-mine/ and Robert Scoble here:
    http://scobleizer.com/2009/03/22/why-rob-diana-is-right-twitter-gets-the-hype-while-facebook-will-get-the-gold/
    Other developments of course include their new lite interface for low bandwidth users (or to compete with twitter) and their recent acquisition of Friend Feed (or should I say the brains behind Friend Feed).
    The other interesting move to me was the speed at which they are all now moving to multi-language.. The recent events in Iran showed how many sites rushed to get Farsi interfaces available.
    Still – it’s pretty closed and is it making money? At what point can they start to monetize this colossus user base.
    Certainly interesting times ahead..

  • Weekly digest of week 33 2009

    A weekly digest offered by Capgemini

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>