All around me I see new social sites being created. Companies, organizations and governments have all become convinced of the use and value of crowd wisdom. Much investment is put into the development of new social applications for customers, employees, members and citizens.
I have said it before: social media is blazing hot right now. To back this, I have collected some stats:
- Facebook has over 140 million users and gets 600.000 new members each day.
- Twitter‘s user count grows at a steady pace of 100.000 per month and should have arrived at 1 million users somewhere mid 2008.
- Ning currently hosts over 700.000 social networks.
- LinkedIn has over 30 million members and its growth rate supposedly outpaces Facebook.
- Wikipedia has over 2 million articles and about 75.000 regular editors.
Creating a new community is as easy as pie, but what I believe many people underestimate is the effort it may take to make a community tick. What makes a community tick and how do you achieve that? What are the steroids that can be used? Wikipedia wasn’t ticking right when it was launched. Judging by these stat charts, it took over two years before Wikipedia became alive. Others have pondered over that too, for example here. This slide deck by Jim Jacoby and Carolyn Chandler of Manifest Digital also provides some very good insights in this.
A new community doesn’t start living and thriving on its own. You need to create and cultivate the soul of your much anticipated community first, and that may take a considerable amount of effort and investment. I would be really interested in seeing some real figures on that. Please share your numbers with us.




Capping IT Off


Did you already noticed this overview: http://www.thefuturebuzz.com/2009/01/12/social-media-web-20-internet-numbers-stats/
Ive been closely following how website growth works.
and social websites work in misterious ways.
I believe that underneath the stats are some social behavior mathematics that corelate to behaviours that can be seen in traditional socological analysis. i.e. The social website is an extension of our existing behaviors rather than a brand new behavior.
Its a very interesting topic that needs some research done on it. But im not so sure that it needs serious investment, just some data, and some time to think about it
I would love to know your thoughts, please contact me here
http://www.simondelliott.com
@rick: thanks for the link. Much appreciated. Those statistics really sum it up nicely.
@simondelloit: thanks for your comment. Good builds. You’re probably right about the correlation to sociology. How typical of me (I am a software engineer which is a breed of people that have lesser social skills by nature) to forget about the sociological aspects!
I took a glance at your blog. Very entertaining and interesting. Definitely worth following, so I dragged your RSS url into my netvibes page…