CTO Blog
« Top Industry Vendors give their views on Clouds | Main | SOA is not dead, but it is Transformed »
Cloud Illusions
Recently I sat down with several of the colleagues and we were discussing the idea of cloud computing. Without going into details of what cloud computing is, let’s think about what they imply for a moment. In all previous incarnations of computing services, those services were extremely durable. Infrastructures, departments, organizations and other trappings of IT as a corporate function arose as yet another department within a corporation with a specific task. Cloud computing on the other hand, looks at things in a more ephemeral way relative to the relationships. In a cloud world, we’re encouraged to make relationships more casually, in the sense that the significant investment in infrastructure and organization is eliminated or minimized. This provides great flexibility, but it also accentuates a new perspective – we don’t have to stick to services that no longer meet our needs, because our sunk cost is negligible. This creates a brand new paradigm of ad hoc computing relationships, based on current and future value rather than past performance. It allows us to adapt and adopt quickly, but more important, it allows us to shed the past without extensive heart ache. As a corollary, the governance and coordination aspects of the cloud call for a new role – the cloud broker, who helps organizations establish, maintain and conclude relationships.
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.capgemini.com/cgi-bin/blog/mt-tb.cgi/1023
Post a comment
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- You are what you eat – or your enterprise is what it communicates
- Not another word on iPad or eBooks! But what about using it for Capgemini Debate TV?
- Why are clouds so hard to understand?
- Microsoft + HP; Oracle + Sun and IBM + IBM
- What do we want from business intelligence?
- Business and IT alignment is getting worse and data/information is the reason
- Jugaad v Lean – doing more with less
- CIOs have their say; the funding model is at the heart of it
- Unstructured Events Call for Unstructured Data (But in Context)
- Clouds – is this a critical insight into the mixed messages?


Comments
# on September 2, 2009 1:35 AM, Michael Burke said:
Hi Sean,
I'm not convinced that clouds really make sunk cost go away for anything but the most trivial use cases.
I've given my 10c here: http://ow.ly/nEXe
Cheers
Mike
# on September 5, 2009 6:13 AM, Collaboration King said:
The world has definitely moved to the cloud. This guy turned the old server closet that used to host e-mail etc. into a meat smoker!
http://bit.ly/eD7zf
# on September 10, 2009 11:01 PM, Sean Rhody said:
Mike, I looked at your comments, and they make sense, but they weren't exactly the way I was looking at the costs. Compared to buying the servers or a mainframe, licensing software, hiring an operations staff, Cloud definitely presents the possibility of a lower cost model (obviously the mileage will vary). You're right though, moving from one to another will never be a "free" move and I don't necessarily see moves being frequent. Cheers.
# on September 11, 2009 3:39 PM, Vegas said:
I agree with Mike´s opinion.
I’m very skeptic about the usability of cloud computing in organizations that have IT services as their core business. I still think CC it’s unreliable in many aspects, and you can’t put a cost on reliability.
Still, it’s an area that deserves our attention, as new developments will surely happen in the future.
# on September 21, 2009 2:12 PM, Divya Mahajan said:
Clouds (IAAS variant) need to perform and deliver, or people will move back to data centers. Take a look at the case of GitHub who save and gain by moving from Virtual machines in a cloud to physical machines (http://github.com/blog/493-github-is-moving-to-rackspace)