New Game Changers for the Internet; Opinions differ on value!

A few weeks back, my normal channels of information were full of news about a revolutionary new web software that was, and I quote; ‘An invention that could change the Internet for ever’. If you haven’t heard, Wolfram|Alpha (and yes the troublesome vertical bar is in the name, but fortunately not in the url – www.wolframalpha.com), is the revolution. The description from the site of its ‘goals’ or capabilities is pretty formidable:
Wolfram|Alpha’s long-term goal is to make all systematic knowledge immediately computable and accessible to everyone. We aim to collect and curate all objective data; implement every known model, method, and algorithm; and make it possible to compute whatever can be computed about anything. Our goal is to build on the achievements of science and other systematizations of knowledge to provide a single source that can be relied on by everyone for definitive answers to factual queries. Wolfram|Alpha aims to bring expert-level knowledge and capabilities to the broadest possible range of people—spanning all professions and education levels. Our goal is to accept completely free-form input, and to serve as a knowledge engine that generates powerful results and presents them with maximum clarity.


Put simply, it tries to answer questions posed in a more ‘human’ way with understandable replies; this makes it less like a search engine and may be a move towards a knowledge management system. The best view of its capabilities is from an excellent piece on Mashable entitled: ‘five things that Wolfram|Alpha does better (and vastly different) than Google’. My own views were echoed by a number of blogs – you need to phrase the question very carefully in order to get a factual reply that can be computed from the range of information available. Otherwise you will get the underwhelming reply: ‘Wolfram|Alpha isn’t sure what to do with your input’. Right now I’m not too convinced that it’s ready – as is claimed – for the normal human being interaction! However you can form your own opinion from two sources. First, courtesy of UK Newspaper The Telegraph is the top ten funny answers Wolfram|Alpha provided to questions and second, it’s back to Mashable for their so called ‘easter eggs’ piece – showing how well it handled some tricky questions.
Now let’s go to a more recognisable new capability which I think in its own way creates a game changer and – unlike Wolfram|Alpha – was a pretty low-key announcement so you may well have missed it. Cordys is the latest company for Dutch serial software entrepreneur Jan Baan who seems to have been in the right place at the right time for each new wave of technology or capabilities. The announcement was made under the title of ‘Cordys enables business process automation for Google Apps’ and once again it takes some digging around to really understand what is a most interesting new capability.
Google Apps provides a wide range of collaboration tools covering everything from Gmail and Google Calendar, through to office productivity tools for producing documents and slides. But it aims at personal productivity and interactions and is therefore effectively ‘unstructured’. This prevents Google Apps from handling other enterprise tasks which require there to be a ‘managed workflow’, and are usually considered to be ‘structured’. Cordys’ Process Factory provides the capabilities to build workflow over Google Apps thus opening up a whole range of new possibilities. Not only that, but it runs from the ‘cloud’ environment and doesn’t require anything to be installed at the user’s site. This opens up the possibility that – as far as I can tell – it could also support intra company workflow too.
The best place to get a ‘look and feel’ is at the Google marketplace, which by the way, I suspect a lot of people don’t know about. It is well worth spending a few moments to see what else is around. So, Cordys may not have the excitement factor of Wolfram|Alpha but it certainly rates for me as a usable breakthrough that takes Cloud Services another step forward.

About the author

61.thumbnail New Game Changers for the Internet; Opinions differ on value! Capgemini Global Chief Technology Officer, Andy is a member of the Capgemini Group management board and advises on all aspects of technology-driven market changes, together with being a member of the Policy Board for the British Computer Society. Andy is the author of many white papers, and the co-author three books that have charted the current changes in technology and its use by business starting in 2006 with ‘Mashup Corporations’ detailing how enterprises could make use of Web 2.0 to develop new go to market propositions. This was followed in May 2008 by Mesh Collaboration focussing on the impact of Web 2.0 on the enterprise front office and its working techniques, then in 2010 “Enterprise Cloud Computing: A Strategy Guide for Business and Technology leaders” co-authored with well-known academic Peter Fingar and one of the leading authorities on business process, John Pyke. The book describes the wider business implications of Cloud Computing with the promise of on-demand business innovation. It looks at how businesses trade differently on the web using mash-ups but also the challenges in managing more frequent change through social tools, and what happens when cloud comes into play in fully fledged operations. Andy was voted one of the top 25 most influential CTOs in the world in 2009 by InfoWorld and is grateful to readers of Computing Weekly who voted the Capgemini CTOblog the best Blog for Business Managers and CIOs each year for the last three years.




This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to New Game Changers for the Internet; Opinions differ on value!

  • If you give it a lot of data, it’ll get confused. Google searches, it doesn’t compute; and this is where Wolfram Alpha shines. It does not care at all how many arguments you give it[..]

  • Andy Mulholland andy mulholland says:

    interesting choice of phrase – ‘arguments’ in connection with Wolfram|Alpha. i think that sums up the point well. if you can construct an argument to suit Wolfram|Alpha it works well but its abilities to react to poorly structured arguments may mean that it is not yet a general purpose tool like Google for the majority of people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>