CTO Blog

You are in: CTO Blog

VOTE FOR ME
CIO Blogs
IT Blog Awards

Subscribe

Recent Posts

Navigate


Search the blog

« Organising for Value or for Events? | Main | Less Speed and more Objectivity on Google Chrome »

Stupid is as Stupid does? Is Google REALLY making us Stupid...

I came across a fascinating article that described the effect of the Internet (as personified by Google), which included some fairly chilling impacts of heavy internet usage - diminished ability to do deep reading (and by association, assimilation of content) of books or articles. The upshot was an interesting exploration of how much the medium actually influences how we think and act. A larger discussion that is still going on is whether the web is making us stupid; affecting how we think and work, mostly in a negative sense. One side considers that we're actually being freed by all of this; which would presuppose that some of the behaviors of pre-internet knowledge work were not necessarily very efficient. So, by using a more search oriented approach, we've achieved better efficiency. I have to believe there's a continuum of effect; that in many case the summary information that a search provides is sufficient, but in some cases, particularly in highly detailed areas, the efficacy of a search / browse model has to give way to a more comprehensive, exhaustive informational model. I suspect though that the basic issue is still critical - how can we use the medium without being affected by it, or failing that, how can we control the extent to which the medium affects us.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.capgemini.com/cgi-bin/blog/mt-tb.cgi/606

Comments

Deep reading is more effected by tv, games and other entertainment then by google imho.

It is not so much that we are becoming stupid, it is just that we are developing different styles of working. I read an article recently (can't remember where) about they way that children use the internet - how they have many information sources open at one time, and flick between them. I agree that this does not encourage "deep reading" - perhaps, as with all things, variety and moderation are the key - i.e. it is a "good thing" to be able to scan many information sources quickly, but then it is also a "good thing" to be able to identify a key source, and read it in depth.

To get behind the name calling on this topic, it's worth looking at the Research evidence. The institute for the future of the mind has some cogent arguments, supported by evidence. I post their link for those interested

http://www.futuremind.ox.ac.uk/research/the-young-mind.html

I am absolutely agreed on "deeep reading" is harmed by TV and other electronic mass-media. Concerning to GOOGLE, it actually inspires my "deep reading" and really saves time on research of it.

Post a comment

Commenting Policy

Name:
Email Address:
URL:
Remember personal info?
Comments: (you can't use HTML tags for style)