| CIO Blogs
IT Blog Awards |
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Voicemail
- What Happens Next? EU and Obama ask the same question
- Tech Predictions 2009: Slow IT
- The Incognito Banking Corporation and the Fairy Godmother 2.0
- What happens to my product portfolio if …
- Technology that Matters
- Apple/O2 versus Blackberry/Vodafone versus Google/T-Mobile
- Tech Predictions 2009: Bricolage IT
- Why Business Models need Cloud Computing
- Now, who's the President?!
Navigate
Search the blog
« Transations and Interactions | Main | The Prescient Mr Smith »
From thinking e mail is a problem to exactly what?
Those of you following the recent news on this topic will have seen individuals complaining about the grip of email and the time it costs them for quite some time now. This has been followed by companies starting to try out email free days including some Silicon Valley high techs including Intel and Veritas. The reasons have two basic roots; one that e-mailing out gets e-mails back and the numbers keep on building so the basic concept of using e-mails is creating more work; the other that e-mail is being misused in the work environment as it allows bad working practice.
Everyone knows and/or has been evolved in episodes of people using e-mail to ‘avoid’ what should be done face to face. A good read on defining good e-mail practice including a code of practice that could be distributed was published in the New York Times recently. Personally as colleagues know I will often respond to an e-mail by picking up the phone to call them to discuss working on the basis that by interacting we are more likely to mutually develop the best answer.
None of this really addresses the point; which is why if one of the essential differentiators of the human race is that it can communicate well enough to use this for collaboration do we have such trouble?
I believe the answer lies in the lack of social context in the form and use of this particular branch of technology, more particular the enterprise e-mail directory offers little social help in determining relationships, and the format is content centric not personally interactive. Simply put it doesn’t allow a group of people to develop a social group by negotiating the common aims, approaches, views, what ever, that will bind them together in behaving cooperatively.
Today we are facing two changes to this situation; the first is a wide range, and still growing selection of technologies; but in many ways it is the second that is the most likely to drive the change, a refresh of the work force. The generation for whom multiple conversations at the same time using various windows on their devices is an entirely normal way of doing their homework with their friends. If you have teens then watch for this phenomenon and see how they have developed real collaboration.
But what should we expect this to drive in our enterprises, markets, indeed in all aspects of business? I have been reading a report by the EU developed by working with various experts in the appropriate fields of technology and business that gives some big insights into this. Entitled ‘New Collaborative Working Environments 2020’ remarkably it can be found online, and it's well worth a read.
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.capgemini.com/cgi-bin/blog/mt-tb.cgi/523


Comments
# on July 7, 2008 1:11 PM, Mark Nankman said:
Good points Andy! Many people are thinking about this.
I have remarked upon this a little bit in http://www.capgemini.com/technology-blog/2008/05/internal_blogs_matter.php.
The way in which people use their web differs a lot. Like you said, teens use it in a more dynamic way than their preceding generation(s). I have made an attempt at vizualizing the way I personally "milk the web" hoping others will enlighten us with their own "spectrums" in http://www.capgemini.com/technology-blog/2008/07/getting_the_most_out_of_your_w.php.
# on July 7, 2008 4:24 PM, andy.mulholland said:
thanks Mark
should have thought to point towards your comments and helpfull hints about your own use !!
best andy
# on July 11, 2008 3:20 PM, Gemini said:
Of late, It has been observed that employees are more involved in (personal) emails exchange and surfing Internet for personal purposes. This study has been done in a few US companies and the survey reported that the employees spent more time on Facebook than on work-related sites. Based on this, some advisors have prepared a list of top 5 activites that, if an employee is found excessively indulged into, can result into firing him/her. Refer these here: http://www.hungamablog.com/2008/07/beware-these-activities-can-get-you.html and be warned bout the circumstances. I would appreciate if this crucial information is shared with maximum employees, so that they do not find themselves in embarassing situations later on.
# on July 11, 2008 3:23 PM, Gemini said:
Of late, It has been observed that employees are more involved in (personal) emails exchange and surfing Internet for personal purposes. This study has been done in a few US companies and the survey reported that the employees spent more time on Facebook than on work-related sites. Based on this, some advisors have prepared a list of top 5 activites that, if an employee is found excessively indulged into, can result into firing him/her. Refer these here: http://www.hungamablog.com/2008/07/beware-these-activities-can-get-you.html and be warned bout the circumstances. I would appreciate if this crucial information is shared with maximum employees, so that they do not find themselves in embarassing situations later on.
# on July 11, 2008 7:54 PM, andy mulholland said:
thanks gemini
i have just taken a look at the url and i will also add that it contains a link to some yahoo advice as well.