| CIO Blogs
IT Blog Awards |
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- New CTO blogger: Sean Rhody on Wireless On-site Collaboration
- SAP are Twittering, IBM are teleporting Avatars, and Google are Lively
- The Gold in Chrome
- Google Chrome
- The 2 Magics and the Hype Cycle
- Wii, Second Life, (and maybe the iPhone), it’s all coming together
- Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, Agile Enterprise, and Business Technology means what?
- User Expectations are being formed outside the Enterprise
- Innovation Brief
- Olympics 2.0, Miss Bikini and the end of Operating Systems
Navigate
Search the blog
« Seduced by the Apple: not so invisible infostructure | Main | The Semantic Web may be becoming more likely with RDF »
Demonstrating for Freedom 2.0
For some reason, I continue to bump into demonstrations. Last weekend I visited London and many roads were blocked due to the Olympic flame passing through. And a few days ago I returned from keynoting the Go Open conference in Oslo - a very well organized event which attracted a solid audience of 600, all interested in open source and open standards – and it resolved into a demonstration too.Although the happening in Oslo obviously was not on the same page as the one in London, I definitely could sympathise with the genuine emotions of the 150 people that showed up, protesting against the decision of the Norwegian standard body to approve Microsoft’s OOXML as an ISO-standard: a – well – rather strange democratic process since an overwhelming majority of the assigned technical committee had voted against it.
There is obviously a lot at stake in the world of standards for ‘office’ documents. But personally, I fail to see why an established organisation like ISO would approve a standard which overlaps considerably with an already in 2006 approved open standard (ODF, the Open Document Format). The very point of standards is that they bring simplicity and unification. Approving multiple, incompatible standards destroys these qualities.
Or was that the point in the first place?
I am not even diving into the discussion why a 6000+ page standard (which is said to include all bugs) would successfully qualify for approval. I guess it is now up to the market to establish the true standard, no matter what ISO decides. Luckily enough, governments and corporations can still make their own choices. If not, you’ll find me carrying around demonstration boards soon enough too.
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.capgemini.com/cgi-bin/blog/mt-tb.cgi/424


Comments
# on April 16, 2008 9:50 AM, Joost van der Waa said:
I am wondering what will happen with OOXML when the users find out that the current OOXML documents produced with Office 2007 are not based on the ISO-standard....
# on April 23, 2008 3:19 PM, Ron Tolido said:
@Joost: well, I believe there is 'Microsoft-OOXML' and 'ISO-OOXML', the latter not yet supported by Office 2007 (or any other tool, obviously). On the other hand, now there is at least standard to work towards. For Microsoft, that is and certainly also for other companies that want to bridge to Office. To me, it still doesn't address the obvious contraction of having two, clearly overlapping 'open standards'. Hence my plea to governments and businesses to make a real choice and not simply endorse multiple standards. We don't want contradictions, do we.
# on June 12, 2008 5:24 PM, Duane said:
It almost looks like some of them have pitchforks and flaming torches. Reminds me of the early days of Greenpeace here in Vancouver. Great post!
# on June 13, 2008 9:14 AM, Ron Tolido said:
Some of them actually might be the same people :) Would Greenpeace use open source...? ("Yeah. Probably").