| CIO Blogs
IT Blog Awards |
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Voicemail
- What Happens Next? EU and Obama ask the same question
- Tech Predictions 2009: Slow IT
- The Incognito Banking Corporation and the Fairy Godmother 2.0
- What happens to my product portfolio if …
- Technology that Matters
- Apple/O2 versus Blackberry/Vodafone versus Google/T-Mobile
- Tech Predictions 2009: Bricolage IT
- Why Business Models need Cloud Computing
- Now, who's the President?!
Navigate
Search the blog
« Software as a Service – IT for the 21st century? | Main | Innovation is hitting the top of the Hype cycle »
Californian Fire Situation and MashUps
I guess if you wanted to take an example of an area in which extensive investments had been made to get communication of factual information right then the government emergency services would probably be a good case.
Yet when an actual emergency occurs then reality is that thousands of people who are involved using Web 2.0 technologies can do a better job of collecting, collating and informing each other than a conventional centralised emergency system.
Yup I mean the catastrophic Californian fire emergency, and for a quick overview on how citizens have been using Web 2.0 then take a look at this link.
One of the surprising examples of this is the Los Angeles Fire Depot using Twitter to broadcast out messages of accidents, fire breakouts, etc., but how does this come about? My own experience of looking into examples like this is that if this idea was formally proposed when there wasn’t a problem then the management would probably reject it as unnecessary and not ‘industrial strength’. However there comes a moment when the issues and problems become serious enough that ideas to ‘save the day’ are called for.
At this point a younger member of staff comes up with the idea of using Twitter, or whatever, and shows how to set this up quickly and immediately, and a grateful management except the capability.
It would be nice to think that this could happen without having to have such an appalling emergency to drive managers towards adopting new technology.
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.capgemini.com/cgi-bin/blog/mt-tb.cgi/245


Comments
# on October 24, 2007 8:41 PM, Tim Kelly said:
Thanks Andy, I hadn't picked up on this fascinating use for Twitter. However, it did occur to me to ask why you were not using it during your conference(?) in Oslo. I have benefitted greatly from the tweets of attendees at conferences, to the extent that it is my near-real-time newsfeed from such events.
# on October 24, 2007 9:03 PM, Niraj J said:
I live in the So Cal Fire area and guess what - twitter feeds are the things I rely to make my next decision as to Fire movements
# on October 24, 2007 9:53 PM, sean said:
Thats great if the electricity grid is still intact. For most major emergencies this probably will not be the case. Mobile networks and electrical were the first to go in Katrina. The "reverse 911" system they just put in place using the plain old telephone also seemed to help out a lot too.
# on October 26, 2007 11:03 AM, andy mulholland said:
The point about mobile/cell phone networks failing early in an emergency situation is a good one and it happened to me in London when we had the underground / bus bombing some years ago.
on the other hand i had a different view on the topic yesterday at a Dutch emergency forces conference. they suggested that centralised single point of failure was more vunerable than distributed methods.
interesting arguement as to whether the telecoms providers will create resilience more successfully than the public sectors systems.