| CIO Blogs
IT Blog Awards |
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Voicemail
- What Happens Next? EU and Obama ask the same question
- Tech Predictions 2009: Slow IT
- The Incognito Banking Corporation and the Fairy Godmother 2.0
- What happens to my product portfolio if …
- Technology that Matters
- Apple/O2 versus Blackberry/Vodafone versus Google/T-Mobile
- Tech Predictions 2009: Bricolage IT
- Why Business Models need Cloud Computing
- Now, who's the President?!
Navigate
Search the blog
« Development Idol | Main | Chinese produce a copy of Second Life »
Web 2.0 = Enterprise 2.0 maybe Real World 2.0
There are multiple ideas about how consumer and business will develop using people centric technologies. In the most recent batch of comments and ideas is a very thoughtful, and thought provoking, market report from three market analysts at Citigroup called; A New Era Dawns’ and it looks at Software as a Service, SaaS, and Web 2.0 becoming the next disruptor in the market. Key amongst the comments is the development of a people centric enterprise based on these new technologies that they christen ‘Enterprise 2.0’.
The resulting enterprise uses a new generation of software in a very different manner from its existing software investments which remain in place. The key to the provision of these new abilities, in addition to the obvious point about business process change, is the ability to use multiple different software implementation capabilities. The report does the best job that I have seen in defining five different possibilities with the characteristics of each; SaaS, ASP, Managed Service, BPO, and of course License. Unfortunately, it’s not available to non Citigroup clients and therefore I can’t offer a URL, but can offer a contact if anyone wants to know more.
This made me think more carefully about the provisioning of the infrastructure on which these models will sit. Again there is an obvious point, who cares it’s a service so delivered from there infrastructure, but that’s not going to cover everything. There is a case for a similar exercise to be done considering what are the options and how will they be delivered for the key elements of a more complex set of services making up the new infrastructure. This would be required for identification, security, compliance and a number of other aspects that are related to people, roles and services, rather than applications, data and hardware.
This type of thinking puts a very different picture not just on the winners and losers in the IT market place, but on the strategic planning aspects of the IT department as it prepares for change. The concept is not new, but the reality of the capabilities that will be required is becoming clearer, as are the options from vendors. It’s becoming time to really start to pay more attention to the major vendors global users events and the keynotes on their strategies.
A light hearted note to finish that should provide some fun posts in reply. What if as well as Enterprise 2.0 we also had Real World 2.0 where users tagging defined everything? Take a look at the results in Supermarket 2.0 at http://glumbert.com/media/supermarket . The acting may not win an Oscar, but the thought behind perhaps should win a prize. It’s a move towards user recommendations linked to real world shopping activities as is happening in online shopping.
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.capgemini.com/cgi-bin/blog/mt-tb.cgi/138
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Web 2.0 = Enterprise 2.0 maybe Real World 2.0:
» Ephedrine erections. from Ephedrine liquid gels.
How to remove pseudo ephedrine. Reducing ephedrine into meth. Ephedrine liquid gels. Biotek ephedrine. Vaspro ephedrine. [Read More]


Comments
# on June 4, 2007 4:05 PM, Tom Mandel said:
"They" christen it 'Enterprise 2.0,' Andy?
You hadn't heard that term previously? Google the name 'Andrew McAfee.' And, take a look at http://www.fastforwardblog.com (along with many dozens - perhaps hundreds, by now - of other sites!).
# on June 4, 2007 4:50 PM, andy mulholland said:
You are of course right Tom, not a good way to have expressed my self. my real point was that it is interesting when even Financial analysts are picking up and using a term.
May be the use of a term by analsyst is an eleventh sign of being in a technology bubble market? see the very interesting view on the ten signs at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/01/sign_tech_bubble/
# on June 22, 2007 8:37 PM, sagar talluri said:
Andy, indeed an interesting link about the technology bubble market .
one question to you Andy ,do u think that the tech sector is going for another down cycle in its sinusoid very soon ?,
Can u give your view on that.
# on June 23, 2007 11:27 AM, andy mulholland said:
If i knew the answer to that question then i would have every financial market analyst at my door!
for what it is worth as a purely personal point of view i beleive that the market will redefine itself around strong growth in the new areas of apply technology to the front office to do better business that creates new high value.
this redefinition will cause problems for many current players as indeed happened when the PC appeared. Wang the marekt leader in office automation vanished to be replaced by Microsoft and a whole new area of venders grew up around ERP.
winners and losers!!
overall - i believe the use of technology by business will continue to increase
hope that helps! other views are welcomed!
# on June 23, 2007 12:31 PM, sagar talluri said:
Thanks Andy,