Too Much User Interface

Many of you are planning to go on holidays soon. I know I am. And I’m confident that you don’t want to spend your valuable free days doing perfectly nothing or – even worse – read that Da Vinci Code for the third time. So during the next week or so, I will point you to some books that you may want to pack in your suitcase. Yes, books. Good, old-fashioned paper. There’s nothing else left in these scarce moments in which you don’t have a high-speech Internet connection nearby. And it’s just fine too. Otherwise you would miss that brilliant opportunity to read Head Rush Ajax.
It’s not a book that I would recommend to you because of its metaphysical depths: it actually introduces you to a programming approach to building highly interactive websites and in the meantime you also figure out how to sell snowboards, you build a coffee maker and you even watch a boxing match.


Well, maybe that is metaphysical after all.
Never mind.
I also don’t think most of you dear readers need to learn how to program in this asynchronous AJAX style. But especially if you are an IT-architect trying to avoid becoming an anachronism, this is a good opportunity to bring yourself up-to-date again with some interesting things happening on the Internet. The feedback on the recent Mummification Item certainly proved that there are some architects that would benefit from a reality check.
And you know you need an update if you still think AJAX has something to do with soccer (and for that matter, let’s not discuss soccer here; in the current phase of the world championships the Dutch are busy erasing the subject from their collective conscience).
I’m not sure yet though, if AJAX is really, really good news. Many people always liked the simplicity and standardization of typical browser-based applications and now – with AJAX and Rich Internet Technology – user interfaces are becoming smarter, faster and more colourful again. Maybe even a bit too much for my own taste. I like the idea of a user controlling an application, not the other way around.
It’s just that Rich Internet Technology enables designers to create any user interface they like. Seems to be the perfect recipe for creating an utter chaos of unbalanced, home-made browser experiences. And then maybe, just maybe, it’s better to have one user interface style after all. Microsoft may be right on track with their ‘Office style’ of applications: it is probably much more attractive to use SAP modules right from the familiar Outlook agenda interface than through any home-made browser application, AJAX-based or not. When we showed the results of an early proof-of-concept of this ‘DUET’ technology on the recent SAPPHIRE conference, it sure provoked a lot of positive feedback.
So this is apparently what you get when browser applications become slightly too diverse: you’re downright happy again to use the old, familiar Outlook. Who would have thought of that?
Gartner consultant Loek Bakker recently argued that we don’t need oriental philosophy in architecture. I don’t fully agree (although I appreciated his item). I like the idea of a ZEN garden – clean, basic, orderly – as the starting point for enlightenment. We need ZEN gardens in our user interfaces too. And we’re not getting any closer with Rich Internet Technology, if applied in the wrong way.
Well, back to the book. Head Rush Ajax is written in this typical ‘Head First’ style: funny, visual, challenging and – as the publisher insists – designed for the way your brain works. Agreed, you may like or dislike the style. And you may or may not be code-phobic. But the book is build in a consistent, simple way. And that’s something you miss, every now and then in the age of Too Much User Interface.

About the author

 Too Much User Interface Vice-president and Chief Technology Officer of Applications Continental Europe, Capgemini. Director, The Open Group. Blogger for Capgemini’s CTO blog and SlowPlanet, the international hub of the Slow Movement. Lead author of Capgemini’s TechnoVision. Speaks and writes about IT strategy, innovation, applications and architecture (and anything else, if he is asked to). Based in the Netherlands, Mr. Tolido currently takes interest in topics such as application rationalization, cloud, BPM and simplicity.




This entry was posted in Technology. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Too Much User Interface

  • Phil Ayres says:

    Ron – Nice post. It seems that here is a book that I might pick over the weekend. From a real bookstore (as even Amazon won’t get it to me on time now!).
    Oh, I’m so looking forward to that real tactile experience of paper on fingertips, rather than mouse and keyboard.
    In fact, I might just turn the PC off for the whole long weekend. Looking at it, everyone else has already, so who is going to read anything I blog?!
    Have a great one.
    Phil

  • Joost says:

    Well, if everybody appears to be happy with the MS-userinterface, it is funny to see that MS will change that dramatically in Office 2007. I wonder what will happen with the user-acceptance…
    Joost

  • Mark Nankman says:

    It is commonly known that software engineers usualy are bad user interface designers. And the new breed “Ajax engineer” may be the worst in that respect. They tend to think in terms of “coolness of javascript tricks” they can do (I should know, because I am one of them). We saw the same sort of behaviour with the early Java Applet engineers (I should know, because I was one of them too, 10 years ago). Over the years, java became mature and so did the java engineers.
    Anyhow, we should leave the design of user interfaces to user interface designers, and leave the software engineering part of that to, well, software engineers.
    Rich Internet Technology (RIT) is an emerging technology that, imho, should be taken very seriously. Traditional Internet Applications usually have awkward, uneffective, “click-and-wait” user interfaces. RIT enables us to build effective and highly usable internet applications, but – like any other technology – it must be applied wisely.

  • Milé Buurmeijer says:

    Then Apple’s iPhone came along. Have you seen its user interface? Awsome touchscreen. For example you can unlock it by moving a slider to the right. That’s far more conveniant then then key combination on my phone. But the real ZEN garden is provided by the single home button! It’s still a phone, but is it?
    Are the operators aware that this phone will kill revenues with its visual voice mail! Check this out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>