Capping IT Off

Capping IT Off

Lego IT - competitive advantage by assembly

Category :

Meeting clients and discussing their IT challenges and how they look at how IT can support competitive advantage is always interesting and enlightening. One common argument that often comes up is that the truly differentiating solutions, where a company builds an edge towards their competitors, need to be supported by internally developed IT systems that are unique. The view is that standard off-the-shelf packages can´t be used since competitors could then copy the solution and the competitive edge would be lost. I would like to state an alternative view on this!

Off the shelf systems with standard functionality can always be used for standard processes that are shared among all companies. This would include things like invoice handling, order handling and similar transactional processes that essentially are hygiene factors that are needed to run a company. These kind of services could also very well be outsourced to a service provider where the company access their needed information and data through a web interface. The main aspect on how to handle these type of services should be on cost containment.

Some core processes, where actual value is added should be developed by the company itself. One of the best examples of such a core process is Google's PageRank algorithm and the systems attached to it. Such a system and service can never be bought from an external supplier, it is in the absolute core of the value creation for Google.

Some other value adding processes could very well be bought as services from other parties. The common factor for such processes is that the value that IT provides to them is in HOW IT is used, not the actual services that are delivered by IT. 

One good example would be Threadless.com, a virtual t-shirt company. The basic logic behind Threadless is that members of the site design their own t-shirt, uploads it to the site (which essentially is a community site), other members of the site vote for their favourite design and the top votes get produced and sold through their website. This has turned out to be a quite profitable business. The value that they add is essentially that they connect designers and consumers of t-shirts, i.e. they are not using a specific proprietary IT service that create value by delivering a specific solution that can't be found somewhere else but it is in HOW they use IT for the purpose of connecting people. The value to the members of the site is not the actual functionality of the site (as long as some basic standards are met), the real value are the other members of the site! I don't know the exact architecture that Threadless uses but let us examine how another company could build a similar solution with standard off the shelf components. Remember, the value is not in the functionality but in HOW that functionality is deployed to connect people (i.e. how do we design a business model, how do we attract people to contribute, should we rewards top contributors and make it visible, can we write insanely funny texts for the webpage to make it fun to read)

  • Infrastructure
    • Use Amazon S3 and EC2 to provide storage and server capacity to run your application.
  • Billing and logistics
  • Finance and HR
  • CRM
  • Networking capabilities
    • Use Ning to build and maintain social network.
  • Communication and marketing
  • T-shirt sourcing
    • Use American Apparel Wholesale t-shirt sourcing for clothes.
  • Printing
I might have missed a few bots and bolts here and there but essentially these are the services that you need to run Threadless. You might want to write a few applications that do some fancy networking data mining and push it back into the application at the Ning platform. But all in all, if your true competitive advantage is in the product you produce (remember, the Threadless value is not the IT, nor the product but the connection of great designers and interested consumers) an off the shelf assembly like this might very well be a great differentiator compared to your competitors.

So this brings us back to the title of this post.What have we actually done here? We have "assembled" a platform that essentially could deliver the same kind of services as the Threadless plattform and we have assembled it by using standard off the shelf services and applications. The competitive advantage comes from the design and architecture of the standard components and HOW we use them. 

This is Lego IT. Give me a box full of Lego pieces and I will probably build a square box in only one colour. Give the same box to Damien Hirst and the result will very very different. He is the superior architect and could probably make something amazing from the standardised pieces that Lego consists of. This is one of the ways companies can create competitive advantage and lower cost with IT at the same time. Might come in handy during next year budget cuts.

About the author

J. Bergeli
J. Bergeli
7 Comments Leave a comment
Interesting post. But looking at the logo at the top of the page I was wondering if this kind of Lego gaming is the right one for the interests of your company...
Anyway, I love the example, and I would like to use it as an example of the 'New IT' coming. Can I?
Hi James
You can sure use it. Just make sure to link :)
Well you are partly right. But we, as a company, must understand this shift in IT. Otherwise we would be like the old horse driven coach driver who didn't wanna switch to cars.
That's a great post Johan - highlighting a similar point to the one Rick made regarding mash ups a few weeks ago - <a href="http://www.capgemini.com/technology-blog/2008/10/mashups_can_be_made_by_your_gr.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.capgemini.com/technology-blog/2008/10/mashups_can_be_made_by_your_gr.php</a>
I completely agree with you that this componentization of IT services is an exciting development; far from eliminating competition, I can see this approach pushing greater diversity and innovation at reduced cost. Organizations can focus resource more on core activity, and less on context / hygiene activities.
Lego IT should = innovation platform...
Just think about the changes that took place in manufacturing as it moved from a craft to mass production.
Mass production required the use of interchangeable parts. Craftsman were still required but just significantly fewer of them. I am sure there will be a few Luddite revolts along the way.
The implications on the off-shore development market will be profound.
All great comments you have here. I had a conversation with a colleague recently and we concluded that if you have 1000 different standard components that all match together, you can build a very large number of different combinations of those components. Possibly more diversity than if every company in the world make stand alone proprietary tools.
John - I rewatched this video last night, it's of a presentation on managing innovation given by Simon Wardley at FOWA 208. You'll love the part where he talks about componentisation of (IT) services speeding the pace of development and innovation. It's very relevant to the Lego it analogy.
<a href="http://jonmulholland.com/2008/10/10/things-i-learnt-at-fowa-from-simon-wardley-googles-20-time-is-not-an-hr-gimmick-its-a-management-inovation-that-creates-continuous-competative-advantage/" rel="nofollow">http://jonmulholland.com/2008/10/10/things-i-learnt-at-fowa-from-simon-wardley-googles-20-time-is-not-an-hr-gimmick-its-a-management-inovation-that-creates-continuous-competative-advantage/</a>
<strong>Simon Wardley and Innovation - Lego IT explained</strong>

This video quite elegantly puts an academic aspect on the concept of Lego IT that I outlined briefly recently. Jon Mulholland notified this in the comment thread. Thank you for the link, Jon....

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.